Thursday, March 14, 2019
#facebookDown facebay user downset, Instagram and Whatsapp also affected
People using social media platforms Facebook, Instagram and WhatSAPP had to deal with problems on Wednesday night.
Many users using Facebook's three platforms in different parts of the world have complained that Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp did not work properly.
The problem is still not fully solved and people are writing and posting it on other social media platforms.
Facebook has acknowledged that some people have difficulty using Facebook applications.
In a tweet made on Facebook, "We are aware that some people are being forced to use Facebook related apps, we are trying to solve this problem as soon as possible."
Let the photo and video sharing app Instagram and Messaging App own the rights to Facebook's proprietary Facebook.
What is the problem
It is not that people are not able to use Facebook completely. Initially Facebook users complained that they are having trouble using Facebook.
Some people were unable to login, some people's news feeds were empty so some pages and profiles could not be accessed.
This problem was not only on smartphone apps but also on desktop browsers.
Users later complained about similar problems with Instagram and What'sapp.
People have had trouble sending photos, videos or other attachments to WhatsApp in WhatsApp.
Facebook says that this problem has not happened due to the DDos attack. Whenever hackers send fake traffic to a website, the website slows or stops because of the burden on the server.
It is called a Distributed Dynamic Option Service Attack or DDos Attack.
The Website called DownTitT has claimed that the number of users facing Facebook's outage problem is more than 11 thousand. By visiting this website, people can report difficulties in websites and apps.
When there was trouble on Facebook, many users turned to Twitter and shared screenshots there and told what the problem was.
There are still many people complaining that their problem remains. There has been no confirmation from the Facebook book that the problem has been removed.
BBC correspondents have also faced problems on Facebook and Whatsapp.
Did Nehru give China the seat for India in the UN Security Council?
China did not allow Masood Azhar, the founder of the terrorist organization Jaish-e-Mohammad, to be declared a global terrorist from the United Nations. China is a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council and vetoed on the proposal of France.
China has done it for the fourth time and it is seen as a major setback for India. On February 14, Jaish-e-Mohammad killed 40 soldiers in a CRPF convoy attacking a suicide bomber in Pulwama district of India-administered Kashmir.
The responsibility for this attack was taken by JeM himself and it was expected that this time China will stand with India on Masood Azhar.
India has expressed grief over the Chinese stand, the main opposition party Congress President Rahul Gandhi has targeted the government for this. Modi did not get a word from the mouth of the people, if China took action against India. "The BJP has strongly objected to Rahul Gandhi's remark on this comment.
Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said that if the country is in difficult, then why is Rahul Gandhi happy?
Prasad, in his press conference, showing a copy of a report of 'The Hindu' of 9 January 2004 , said that India's first Prime Minister, Nehru, had refused to take the seat of the Security Council in the United Nations and had given it to China.
In the report of The Hindu, the reference was given to the book "Nehru-The Invention of India" by the Congress leader and the general secretary of the United Nations, Shashi Tharoor.
In this book, Shashi Tharoor has written that around 1953 India had received a proposal to become a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council but they gave it to China. Tharoor has written that Indian diplomats had seen that file which was referring to Nehru's denial. According to Tharoor, Nehru advocated giving the UN seat to China after Taiwan.
In fact, Ravi Shankar Prasad wanted to say that if China is a permanent member of the UN Security Council today, then India is facing the consequences of Nehru and the same.
However, many people believe that those who criticize Nehru about this thing ignore many other facts. The United Nations was formed in 1945 and the organization associated with it was taking shape.
When the members of the Security Council were formed in 1945, India was not even free. On September 27, 1955, Nehru had clearly dismissed the Parliament that India had received an informal proposal to become a permanent member of the Security Council.
In response to questions of Dr JN Parekh on September 27, 1955, Nehru had said in Parliament, "There was no formal or informal proposal to become a permanent member of the Security Council in the UN. Some suspicious references are being cited in which there is no truth. In the United Nations, the Security Council was formed under the UN Charter, and it had permanent membership in certain countries. There can be no change in the charter without modification or any new member. There is no question that there was a seat given to India and India refused to take it. Our declared policy is to include all the countries eligible to become members of the United Nations. "
What is history?
It is said that in the 1950s, India was a great supporter of China's involvement in the United Nations Security Council. Then this seat was with Taiwan.
Since the emergence of the People's Republic of China in 1949, China's representative Chiang Kai-shek was ruled by the Republic of China, not Mother's People's Republic of China. The United Nations refused to give this seat to the People's Republic of China.
Shashi Tharoor has written in his book that India's Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was the one who advocated the People's Republic of China for making permanent members in the United Nations.
Nehru supported the People's Republic of China?
Some believe that Nehru did this to please Mao in the 1950s in the wake of agitation between the two countries.
Others argue that for the sake of solidarity among Asian countries, Nehru put a wrong place in excitement, because on seeing the history of both countries, it is understood that China and India have been partners in this historic journey.
Roughly, many see it as a reduction in Nehru's assessment of idealism and the realities of international relations. They believe that strength matters and there is a need to work wisely for this.
The diplomat wrote in a report, "Although those who argued this, they have failed to know the reasons behind Nehru in supporting the People's Republic of China in the United Nations. They do not know that Nehru used to read so much about history and the balance of power among the nations was very important for him.
From that time on, Nehru believed that big powers should not stay away from their friends, but they should be included in international organizations.
Nehru believed that after the First World War, Germany was treated unfairly, and the spirit of insult and boycott brought him closer to another disgruntled USSR.
Nehru was clear about the fact that the People's Republic of China is no ordinary power.
In the diploma , South Asian University, Assistant Professor Nabarun Roy of the Department of International wrote, "In April 1922 Germany signed the Rappollah Treaty with Russia, which increased tension in Europe. But Britain, in time, helped him to become a member of the League of Nations in 1926. Despite this, the Great Depression made it a threat to global stability again. It was clear to Nehru that the People's Republic of China was no ordinary power.
Therefore, it should be adjusted in global politics because if it is not done then it can later become dangerous in an unexpected way. This was the biggest argument that led the Nehru's stand on the permanent membership of China in the Security Council. "
Roy wrote, "Nehru believed that" because of the new China, the balance of power has changed not only in the east but throughout the world, therefore, not just adjusting the People's Republic of China in world politics is not only stupidity but dangerous Nehru believed that if the People's Republic of China was excluded from the United Nations, then the UN's decisions will not affect China.
It is said in international relations that as a country becomes strong, its ambition also increases.
India too has not been different in this case. In recent times, its military and economic power has increased, in such a way that its desire to play a larger role in world politics has also increased.
One of these is that India has consistently been demanding a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council for the last few days.
Indian leaders have made sincere efforts in various forums including the United Nations General Assembly, so that the qualifications of India as a permanent member of the international community is expressed.
The results of these efforts are also not completely disappointing. Major powerful countries such as USA, UK, France and Russia have expressed their support on many occasions about India's membership.
However, China has been a tough opponent. Given the recent developments, it is not surprising, because on some occasions the relationship between the two countries has come to an end.
Both share a long dispute, and in 2017, there was a situation like deadlock and a ceasefire between the two countries in Dokalmal.
India and China are engaged in finding strategic targets for footsteps in South Asian and Indian Ocean areas.
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Where was Ajit Doval at the time of the release of Masood Azhar? The truth of Rahul Gandhi's claim
Congress President Rahul Gandhi has claimed that Masood Azhar, who was convicted of the Pulwama attack, had left India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval himself in Kandahar (Afghanistan) on the plane.
In a meeting of party workers in Delhi on Monday , Rahul Gandhi said, "Who broke the bomb in the bus in Pulwama?" Jaish-e-Mohammed, Masood Azhar. You will remember that 56-inch chests were in the previous government when in the aircraft Ajit Doval, who is now National Security Advisor, sitting with Masood Azhar, he went to Masood Azhar and returned to Kandahar. "
Two of the Congress party's martyrs have been martyred, Do not be afraid.
But just that part of Rahul Gandhi's statement where he speaks 'Masood Azhar ji' has become viral on social media.
Several other big BJP leaders including Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad shared this viral video. It has been seen millions of times on social media. However, another video is being shared in which Ravi Shankar Prasad Hafiz Saeed is saying Hafiz ji.
But who has heard Rahul Gandhi's full speech on the tube, he is curious to know that what was the role of National Security Advisor Ajit Doval in "reaching Kandahar" from Masood Azhar's release from India?
We found that Rahul Gandhi's claim that 'Ajit Doval had gone to Delhi from Kandahar in the aircraft with Masood Azhar' was not correct. Ajit Doval was already present in Kandahar and was involved in the process of negotiation with the Taliban for the release of the passengers.
Story of Masood Azhar to reach Kandahar
Within 10 months of the arrest of Masood Azhar in India along with the Portuguese passport, the extremists had abducted some foreigners in Delhi and demanded the release of Masood Azhar in return for leaving them.
The campaign was unsuccessful as Uttar Pradesh and Delhi Police managed to get rid of hostages from Saharanpur.
After one year, Harkat-ul-Ansar again kidnapped some foreigners and tried to rescue them, but these efforts were also unsuccessful.
In 1999, the tunnel was dug to remove Masood Azhar from Co Kot Bhalwal jail in Jammu, but this attempt of extremists to remove Masood also failed.
After a few months in December, 1999, the extremists kidnapped an Indian aircraft (Indian Airlines flight number IC-814) and escaped to Kandahar and instead of leaving the pilgrims, the Indian government agreed to release three extremists including Masood Azhar. was.
At that time Amarjeet Singh Dulat, the head of the Indian intelligence agency, told the BBC correspondent Rehan Fazal that "Zarghar was brought to Srinagar Jail and Masood Azhar from Jammu's Kot Bhalwal jail in Srinagar, both of whom had sat in a small Gulfstream ship. . "
"There was a bandage in the eyes of both of them, before being aboard my ship, both were seated in the back of the ship and there was a curtain in the middle of the ship, I was sitting on one side of the curtain and on the other side Zararg and Masood Azhar. "
They said that a few seconds ago, the information was received a few seconds ago that we have to reach Delhi as soon as Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh was waiting for us to go to Kandahar at the airport.
Dutt says, "As soon as landing in Delhi, these two extremists were taken to Jaswant Singh's ship in which the third extremist Omar Sheikh was already present." Our job was to extend Zararg and Masood to Delhi. "
'Decision maker'
Former Raw Chief, Amarjit Singh Dulat, points out that the question was raised, who along with these detainees, Kandhara from India, who is Kandahar?
It is recorded in the official record that the Intelligence Bureau's Ajit Doval was present in Kandahar even before the plane was flying from Delhi.
Along with him, Joint Secretary of the Ministry of External Affairs Vivek Katju and Rao's CD Sahai were also in Kandahar. The three officers were constantly trying to negotiate with the Taliban to negotiate.
These three officers had said in a tone that Kandhar should be sent to someone who could make big decisions when needed, because it would not be practical to see Delhi for every decision.
Bainakular' found in Gift
When the Indian aircraft reached Delhi from Kandahar with the three extremists, at about five o'clock, Ajit Doval went to visit the pilgrims on the hijacked plane.
When he got off the plane, two criminals Berger and Sandy (name changed to the Taliban separatists) presented Ajit Doval a small 'bainakular' .
In reference to Doval, Jaswant Singh wrote in his autobiography, 'A Call to Honor - In Service of Emerging India' , "He told me that he was keeping an eye on the activities being carried out of this 'bayanakular'. When he left for Kandahar to Delhi, Doval showed it to the 'Binakular' External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh, we said that this Binakular will remind us of our bad experience in Kandahar. "
Angry farewell abdullah
Former Indian Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh has written in his autobiography, "As soon as the three extremists came down, we saw that they were very welcomed. By the time they got down our stairs were removed so that we could not get down. The people present below were shouting in joy, the relatives of the three extremists were brought to Kandahar from Pakistan to ensure that we have given real people Left. "
Prior to the release of these extremists, Amarjit Singh Dulat was sent to Srinagar to celebrate National Conference leader Faraq Abdullah.
Former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah, Mushtaq Ahmed Zargar and Masood Azhar were not ready to leave. Dulat points out that he had to stress the heel peak to celebrate Faraq Abdullah.
Fearing that the Jamaat-e-Islami was banned, Abdullah said in a statement given to the news agency PTI this week , "We are now telling a traitor, we had told from his government (BJP) in 1999 that Masood Azhar Do not release them, we were against that decision, even today. "
Wednesday, March 6, 2019
What is the truth of the claim of 'death of 292 extremists' in Balakot?
On the social media, an alleged Whatsapp chat is being claimed that 292 extremists were killed in an attack by the Indian Air Force in Balakot, Pakistan.
Those who have shared screenshots of this alleged conversation in Whitesap Groups and Facebook Groups have claimed that these conversations have happened between any of their Indian friends and someone named 'Doctor Ijaz' who lives in Balakot.
Most people have shared 3 screenshots with this claim.
Some people have also claimed that the person whose name is visible in the screenshot is only a doctor in Balakot and the day the air strikes were held, they were present near the spot. So they can tell the exact figure of the dead. '
What's in the screenshot?
Are viral on social media this 'chat' look on starting something significant like this:
Character 1: Hey brother what is this ... Tomorrow, the Indian Army has an Air Strike ... Is this a true story or is the media showing itself?
Character 2: Janab, some air force aircrafts were in Balakot and the nearby area ... but it is wrong to cross the LoC ... but Allah has mercy.
Character 1: Yes, some 12 planes went ... but if Jaish-e-Mohammad attacks Pakistan, then India will not answer it ... And brother, tell how many people were killed?
Character 2: Brother ... no locals were killed ... those who were killed were extremists ... we were troubled by them.
This is the part of the so-called conversation that has been shared most frequently on social media.
The number of dead in this screenshot is almost as much as some of India's media channels have been saying on the basis of unconfirmed information.
Bharatiya Janata Party President Amit Shah also said that more than 250 extremists were killed in this attack on Sunday.
Indian Air Force chief BS Dhanoa said on Monday that counting the number of people killed in the attack is not of the Air Force. Those goals were given to Air Force, they hit them.
The Government of India has not officially issued any statement on the number of people killed in this attack.
Message - True or Lies?
On the basis of whatsapp messages, people who understand the fact that 292 extremists are correct, they actually seem to have a sophisticated message, because the most important thing is that there is no medical university in Balakot town of Pakistan.
Balakot is in Manchera district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. This town is one of the four ancient coastal areas of the Indus Valley Civilization and is situated on the banks of the Kunhar river.
The most popular Balakot for tourism in Pakistan is located approximately 160 kilometers from the capital of Islamabad.
According to the Medical and Dental Council of Pakistan, the closest government medical college for people in Balakot town is located in Abbottabad.
The Indian Air Force had on Tuesday banned the bomb near Balakot on 26th February, the BBC's ally, Mr Jarral, who first spoke to locals and eyewitnesses, has confirmed this .
He told BBC correspondent Prashant Chahal , "There is no medical university in Balakot. There is only one 'Basic Health Unit' in Balakot, which has a Doctor and some people are staffed. There is no facility to recruit patients is."
Jarral explains, "After the attack, we had seen the 'Basic Health Unit' of Balakot, Mansarra and Garhi Bulla, but there was no one injured person there, all of which were located at a distance of about half an hour from the location of the Health Center attack. Are. "
Journalist Shariz Hassan, who had been living in Punjab from Punjab, made fun of this viral message on Twitter saying that 'terrorism' and 'wounded' words are not used in Pakistan.
Subscribe to:
Comments
(
Atom
)
